Front Cover Summer 2019
KATHERINE JACOBSON
various weather conditions. This bill would require the De-
The AKC governmental relations department has been busy
partment of Agriculture and Markets to issue “red and blue
this year with a number of concerning legislative proposals,
code alerts through public service announcements to notify all
each of which would have a detrimental effect on dog owners,
owners of companion animals in the area to bring their ani-
breeders, exhibitors and competitive events. Two come from
mals inside.” A blue alert would be issued when the tempera-
the state of New York where the Environmental Conservation
ture will reach 25 degrees or lower without precipitation, 32
Committee in the state assembly is considering a bill that
degrees or lower with precipitation, or if the wind chill will be
would prohibit any contest or competition where the objective
lower than zero degrees for at least two hours. A red alert
is the hunting or taking of wildlife for prizes or entertain-
would be issued when the heat index is forecasted to be 95-99
ment. This bill would severely impact the ability of those who
degrees for at least two consecutive days, or when tempera-
wish to compete with the traditional sporting breeds in events
tures reach 100-104 degrees for any length of time. No one
designed to showcase a dog’s original purpose. Although the
would be able to leave an animal outside or in a vehicle when
state assembly amended the bill to exclude field trials in dog
an alert has been issued. Those who violate the alerts will be
training areas, it would nonetheless prevent other competi-
given a warning and if they do not comply, the animals may
tions in the state when wildlife is killed. The official memo for
be seized. The bill does exempt working dogs and situations
the bill includes language straight from the animal activists’
when appropriate shelter is provided, however, it is not clear
talking points when it states that “competitions or contests
if shelter is required when the dog is outside for a brief period
such as these are inhumane and provide incentive to killing
or if the owner is present. The principle problem with the bill
animals for glory, prizes or titles. They are different from the
is that it specifies particular temperatures as dangerous, again
average hunting experience since they are often rigged with
without taking into consideration the vast differences among
animals that cannot escape. In many cases these competitions
dogs’ ability to tolerate heat or cold. This is yet another ex-
are conducted in a party-like atmosphere and are more like
ample of how a “one size fits all” approach to a perceived
slaughters or massacres and are unsportsmanlike. These com-
problem might prove to have unintended consequences. Every
petitions would be considered cruel by a typical hunter and
dog should be provided with adequate shelter and a safe envi-
promote excessive and unnecessary killing of wildlife.” Such
ronment, but designating arbitrary temperatures as
hyperbole, when coupled with the ignorance of many legisla-
“dangerous” will not replace a dog owner’s understanding of
tors as to what a field trial actually is, can be used to accom-
his or her companion and could even result in the seizure of a
plish a radical animal rights agenda at the expense of people
dog who was in no danger at all, or the death of one left out
dedicated to the preservation of purpose-bred dogs.
at a “safe” temperature.
The second problematic bill currently advancing through the
It is up to us, as dog owners and lovers, to protect our dogs
New York legislature would restrict when dogs are permitted
and our interests and to remain vigilant in our opposition to
to be outdoors. As it is currently written, Senate Bill 4577
those who would decide what is best for us and for our be-
would designate certain temperatures as too dangerous for a
loved companions.
dog to be outside. Such legislation utterly fails to take into
account the vast differences among breeds’ ability to tolerate
8
Made with FlippingBook HTML5